Merger and Acquisition Advice
www.MandAadvice.com
BLOG.MANDAADVICE.COM

Business owners must prepare for succession

Business owners must prepare for succession

News and Observer Sunday June 19, 2010

It's critical that every family-owned business have an exit strategy.

The typical owner rarely wants to give up the controlling reins, nor does he want to face his own mortality. As a result, a family retail, service or manufacturing business often creates an uncertain and risky future.

Instead of burying their heads in the sand, owners should give equity positions in the company to younger managers so they are in the position to control the business when the boss gets sick, dies or retires, said Rhodes Craver, a Durham lawyer who specializes in business and family law.

That's especially true when where there are no family members to take over. What's more, future bosses need incentives to stay with the company often in the form of some equity ownership.

A successful succession plan is based on open communications between the owner and other family members if the goal is to bring children into the business, said Cooper Biersach, co-director of the UNC Kenan-Flagler Family Enterprise Institute.

In addition, it's a good idea for the children to work for another company before joining the family business. "This way," Biersach said, "they gain experience, make mistakes and learn their ABCs in a different workplace."

She maintains that the family business would benefit from an independent board of advisers, which would operate somewhat like a board of directors. A priority on their agenda is to guide the CEO into sound succession planning.

According to the Family Business Institute, 89 percent of current business owners believe that their family will control the business during the next five years. Yet, statistics do not support that optimism since only 30 percent of business survive into the second generation, and about 3 percent continue under the same family for four generations.

When management is unable to find a successor or make arrangements for key employees to purchase the company, it faces two alternatives: finding an outsider to buy the company, or closing down the operation.

Son buys the business

Jeff Monsein, 52, president and owner of the Aluminum Co. of North Carolina, worked at the window installation company started by his father, Melvin, in the early 1960s. Jeff Monsein was employed part time while a high school and college student. In 1983, his father, ill with emphysema, wanted to retire.

"His immediate goal was to sell the company then grossing $1 million in sales, but nobody offered him the amount that he thought it was worth," Monsein said. "My dad really wanted to continue working, but he was not well enough to work full time."

The quandary was solved when Jeff, at age 25, bought the business on a 10-year payout; his father died several years later in 1989.

Monsein has four children. The three daughters, who are 24, 23 and 20,haven't shown much interest in taking over the business. His youngest child, Ryan, is a high school student and is working at the company this summer. He has the potential to get involved with the $12 million business.

"As of now, I have no other succession plan," he said. "I've talked about it with my accountant, but that's as far as it has gotten. I have no intentions of stepping down any time soon."

Father prepares plan

Ray Sparrow, 65, already knows his son Jim, 41, will succeed him as head of the Water Specialist, a nearly 40-year old water treatment company in Hillsborough.

The business, which repairs and installs water systems, is an outgrowth of a plumbing company that Sparrow's family started in 1954.

To prepare for a management turnover, Sparrow attended workshops conducted by the SCORE office in Chapel Hill that covered the steps to be followed in an orderly succession of ownership. As part of the workshops, Sparrow prepared a plan to be followed by the new owners.

"My succession plan is rather simple," Sparrow said. "I don't want to sell it to Jim since it means he'd be faced with financing the purchase. When I die, I'll simply will it to him."

Meanwhile, Jim Sparrow does not sit in the wings wondering what's next. According to the father, Jim is already in charge of 80 percent of the business, which grosses more than $1.2 million a year in sales.

As Water Specialty's CEO, Ray Sparrow no longer focuses on day-to-day operations. Instead, he concentrates on improving the company's management methods, and thinking through its strategic business plan.

Owner hands off

John R. McAdams, president of the land development company bearing his name, has for the past several years been making the transition to new ownership. McAdams founded the Research Triangle Park company 30 years ago.

McAdams' plan, which has been in effect for several years, calls for him to divest stock to several longtime, key managers. By the time that he's 70 in eight years, ownership will have switched hands to them.

"We have already designed who will succeed me as president," McAdams said. "The intent is to be orderly about the transition for the reassurance of both company personnel and our clients."

The recent sluggish economy has, however, resulted in suspending the transition for several years since stock purchases are funded, McAdams says, through bonuses.

"In response to this slowdown in the changeover, I'll be selling shares at a greater rate in the years ahead to get us back on track in the management change,"McAdams said.

Robert K. Otterbourg can be reached at      919-489-9591 or rkotter@aol.com.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

How the New Wealth Taxes Will Hit You

How the New Wealth Taxes Will Hit You

by Laura Sanders
Monday, June 14, 2010

provided by
wsjlogo.gif

The health-care bill that Congress passed in March contained two surprising new taxes to help pay for the changes: an extra 0.9% levy on wages for couples earning more than $250,000 ($200,000 for singles) and a new 3.8% tax on investment income on those same people (technically, people with "adjusted gross incomes" above those amounts).

 

Each tax signals a radical change in policy. For workers, the extra 0.9% levy puts a progressive element in what used to be a totally flat tax. The 3.8% tax on investment income also knocks down a longstanding wall by applying a "payroll" tax to unearned income. Until now, FICA taxes for Social Security and Medicare have applied only to wages, not investment income.

While many details remain unclear and the Internal Revenue Service hasn't issued any guidance, here are preliminary answers to the most important questions taxpayers are asking.

These taxes take effect in 2013, two elections away. Might they be repealed first?

Not likely. "Congress would have to undo the health reform, and budget constraints would still be there," says Clint Stretch of Deloitte Tax. "Even if Republicans take control of Congress, President Obama holds the veto pen until Jan. 20, 2013."

Obama.jpg
President Obama's health-care overhaul imposes new taxes on earnings. (Getty Images)

How does the 0.9% tax work?

If Joe and Mary each earn $175,000, their total employment income is $350,000. Currently they owe 1.45% -- $5,075 -- of regular Medicare tax, and their employers owe a matching amount. In 2013, the couple will owe an extra 0.9% -- $900 -- on their wages above $250,000, which is $100,000. Their employers pay nothing extra.

What about the 3.8% tax on net investment income?

This levy is keyed to "modified adjusted gross income," with a threshold of $250,000 for couples and $200,000 for singles. (This is simply adjusted gross income for nearly everybody except expatriates, who must add back certain exclusions.) The tax is a flat 3.8% on investment income above the threshold.

 

How would this work?

Example 1: John and Jane, a married couple, have $400,000 of AGI -- $200,000 of wages plus $200,000 of investment income. Because they have $150,000 of investment income above the $250,000 threshold, they would owe an extra $5,700.

Example 2: Anne, a single filer, earns $40,000 but has an investment windfall of $190,000, for total income of $230,000. Because she has investment income of $30,000 above her $200,000 threshold, she would owe $1,140 of additional tax.

Example 3: Retirees Mary and Bill have no wages but they do have a taxable IRA payout of $90,000, plus investment income of $150,000, for a total of $240,000. They don't owe the new tax, because they have no investment income above the $250,000 threshold.

What is investment income?

Interest, except municipal-bond interest; dividends; rents; royalties; and capital gains on the sales of financial instruments like stocks and bonds. The taxable portion of insurance annuity payouts also counts, unless it is from a company pension. So do gains from financial trading, as well as passive income from rents and businesses you don't participate in. All are subject to the 3.8% tax on amounts above the $250,000 or $200,000 threshold, as described above.

Not taxed: Distributions from regular and Roth IRAs and other retirement accounts, including pensions and Social Security, and annuities that are part of a retirement plan. Life-insurance proceeds, muni-bond interest and veterans' benefits don't count, nor does income from a business you participate in, such as a Subchapter S or partnership.

Could the 3.8% tax apply to gains on the sale of a home?

Yes, if there is a taxable gain above the $500,000 ($250,000, single) exclusion for gains on the sale of your residence.

Example: Fred and Fran, who bought their home in a New York suburb for $50,000 in 1972, sell it in 2013 for $1 million. After subtracting the $50,000 cost and $500,000 exclusion, they have investment income of $450,000. If they also have a taxable IRA payout of $70,000 and a pension of $30,000, they would owe the tax of $11,400 on $300,000.

What happens if a taxpayer who owes the new tax on investments also has a large itemized deduction -- say, medical expenses or a theft loss?

Even if taxable income is zero because of deductions, he or she could still owe the 3.8% tax. Example: Myra is a single filer with investment income of $100,000 and wages of $200,000. But during the same year she loses $300,000 in a Ponzi scheme. She pays no income tax, but she still owes the new Medicare tax of $3,800 on her net investment income, says Sharon Kreider, a tax expert in Sunnyvale, Calif.

Does the 3.8% tax affect trusts and estates?

Yes, and it can hit them hard. The tax is levied on investment income as low as $12,000 that isn't paid out to beneficiaries. Some believe the tax may also hit children's unearned income subject to the "kiddie tax" if the parents owe it themselves.

What professions are able to avoid this tax?

Ms. Kreider and others see a sweet spot for real-estate professionals. The law deems their rents to be "active" income, so they wouldn't be subject to the investment tax. Often they don't owe self-employment taxes on that rental income, either.

What steps do experts recommend to minimize these taxes, other than taking capital gains before 2013 or buying municipal bonds?

• Examine both your regular and investment income: the higher your regular AGI, the more likely that your investment income will be subject to the new tax. So while Social Security and pensions don't count as investment income, they raise AGI. This makes Roth IRA conversions even more attractive for many. "Roth withdrawals don't raise AGI and aren't investment income," says Vern Hoven, a tax expert in Gig Harbor, Wash.

• Reconsider a defined-benefit pension if you're eligible -- say, you're in a small business or have consulting income, says Mark Nash of PricewaterhouseCoopers. Pension payouts don't count as investment income, and the older a taxpayer is, the more he can contribute.

• Taxpayers selling assets should consider installment sales, says Ms. Kreider, if spreading out the income would minimize the new tax.

• For some, life insurance may become more attractive. Because life-insurance proceeds at death aren't subject to this tax, a taxpayer could buy a policy, borrow from it and settle up at death, avoiding income tax on investment gains within the policy. But Mr. Nash cautions that the savings must outweigh the fees and other disadvantages such policies may have.

Write to Laura Saunders at laura.saunders@wsj.com

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

M&A Advisors and Intermediaries Will Hate this Blog, Some Sellers Don’t Have to Pay Brokerage Fees

If you own a private business with annual sales in excess of $20 million, you have been contacted by one of the national Mergers & Acquisitions firms who have lead you to believe your business was worth twice its actual value.  In addition, maybe they got you to stroke a check for $15,000-$40,000 for a valuation which would be credited against the brokerage fee when they sold your business.  I’m sure you have even received a similar pitch from a “financial banker” (a business broker with a series 7 license) or you have even been contacted by a local intermediary firm like ours.   We told you that we would sell your company and you would only have to pay us if we brought you an acceptable deal. All of that has changed…some company owners don’t have to pay a cent to anyone to sell their businesses in the current market.

 

The facts:

 

  • If your business has approximately $20 million in annual sales & at least $2 EBITDA, there are dozens of buyers for every seller. This also applies to businesses with lower annual sales (to $10 million) but higher EBITDA and/or higher sales that historically supported higher EBITDA which are lower due to the recession.
  • Currently, there is a shortage of deals in the market and good deals are attracting the attention of numerous Private Equity Groups & Strategic Buyers resulting in multiple offers.
  • Banks are not lending for the middle market transactions and most deals involve higher ratios of equity (40% - 60%) and include mezzanine or other private non-bank financing. The result is that transactions are more expensive and require much more capital upfront.
  • Private company values are now in a very narrow valuation range. Most middle market private equity deals for healthy companies with good balance sheets are selling in the 4-5 multiple of EBITDA range. Look at public companies and they reflect this trend as of today (6/02/2010) Microsoft is trading at a 7.75 multiple (market cap to trailing 12 month EBITDA) Dell 5.07, Exxon 6.53, and for a company with some problems BP is trading at a 3.6 multiple.

 

Do to the simple economics of supply and demand if you are the owner of a private company that fits into the $20 million sales $2 EBITDA criteria, you don’t have to pay a fee to sell your business. Firms like ours will provide you with an opinion of value in today’s market, work with you to present your financials in the best light, assist you with add-backs to EBITDA and confidentially bring qualified buyers to make offers on your business. Why do we do this at no cost to you? Simply put, buyers are paying for access to good deals. Intermediaries should never be the sole party negotiating a deal for you as they are an interested party in getting a transaction done (so they can get paid). You should rely on your attorney to negotiate deal terms and a purchase agreement when you receive an acceptable offer. The intermediary serves best as a neutral party insuring confidentiality, open communications, qualifying buyers and presenting your data to the buyer so you can run your business.

 

Our advice is this…don’t pay up front fees, don’t sign long term exclusive agreements that benefit the broker not you and don’t allow your representative to exclude other brokers who wish to co-broke (ask their policy up-front).  Finally, if you want to sell your company in 2010 before the capital gains tax rate goes up, you better start today!

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

What’s That Business Worth?

What’s That Business Worth

Fair Pricing for Buyers and Sellers

Whether you are planning to buy an existing business or expect to sell one you currently own, one of the biggest challenges involves deciding on a fair price.  As the buyer, if you pay too much, you risk damaging future profit by digging too deep a hole early in your ownership cycle.  As the seller, asking too little unfairly discounts the investments you made that created a successful business.  Additionally, an improperly priced company sends the wrong message to potential buyers.  If a business is being sold for significantly less than its true value, potential owners will immediately sense that something is wrong.  This is hardly the way to attract a group of qualified buyers.

Abandon the Dartboard

Believe it or not, one of the most common ways people price a business for sale is by guessing.  “Well, I paid X dollars ten years ago and made Y dollars a year in profit, so I’ll figure a 10 percent annual increase in value and sell it for Z dollars.”  Good luck convincing a savvy buyer that the price tag you posted is an accurate one.  One of the dangers of putting the wrong value on a business involves a concept called “shelf life.”  The longer your business remains unsold, the likelier it is you will sell it for far less than its true worth.  Let’s say you guess that your business is worth $1 million.  Maybe it is -maybe it’s not.  But because you have no facts to back up your claim, your company stays on the market for months and months.  As you get more anxious to sell, you keep dropping the price until a buyer surfaces.  That is neither a profitable nor a sensible exit strategy.

Revenue Versus Profit

A popular way to put a price on an existing business involves looking at its annual revenue.  Lots of so-called experts tout this as the most accurate method to decide if a price is fair.  Every industry supposedly has its own “multiple.”  For example, a manufacturing company would sell for “three times annual revenue,” with a real estate brokerage at 1.5 times revenue, and so on.  This metric is so ingrained in the American business psyche that reference materials quoting the proper multiple for a particular field are abundant.  But anyone familiar with Internet companies will tell you that sales do not equal profits.  Look at how many dot-coms logged millions of dollars of revenue each year and still went belly-up because they were spending more than they took in.  If you insist on using a linear measure like this, at least consider multiples of earnings, not gross sales.

Cash-Flow Projections

Applying standard accounting methods can create a more accurate assessment of a company’s valuation.  Begin with annual earnings (revenue minus expenses) and project that figure into the future as a function of growth.  Let’s assume your target company earned $50,000 last year and $52,000 this year, so an additional two-grand-per-year bump is not out of the question.  In five years, the business would earn $270,000, which is $50K (Year 1) + $52K (Year 2) + $54K (Year 3) + $56K (Year 4) + $58K (Year 5).  Then take a look at current T-Bill interest rates.  If these instruments are paying a two percent dividend, it means you have to start with $2.7 million in cash to earn the same $270,000 over five years at two percent.  No one is likely to put that kind of money of risk if they can get an equal or better return from a safe, and fully guaranteed vehicle like Treasuries.  Under these conditions, an asking price of $2.7 million or more is high.  If this sounds too complicated, ask your accountant for clarification.

* Here is the math: $270,000 ÷ 2 percent = $13.5 million ÷ 5 years = $2.7 million invested.

This Equals That

For decades, the home real estate industry has flourished by using something called “comps,” which is short for comparables.  In simple terms, if I own a three-bedroom house in a similar neighborhood to yours that has roughly equivalent amenities - square footage, number of bathrooms, yard size, attached versus detached garage, and so on - and it recently sold for X dollars, then your home should be reasonably close to the same value.  Cities use this formula all the time to help determine valuation for property tax purposes.  But because businesses change hands far less frequently than do homes, and with so many intangibles involved - location, clientele, staff, and the skills of each respective owner - business comparables may only give you the barest sense of a company’s valuation.  Still, it can be a worthwhile tool, especially when paired with the cash-flow method described above.

Ask an Expert

Business brokers, bankers and accountants (especially CPAs) are excellent sources of advice when trying to place a value on a business. Whether you are the buyer or the seller, the moneylenders engaged in the process - plus the people who buy and sell companies all day long - have their fingers on the pulse of business valuation.  Don’t hesitate to get them involved as well.

AddThis

AddThis AddThis AddThis AddThis AddThis

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Know When to Walk Away, Know When to Run

We talk to owners constantly who are ready to exit their businesses but think now is the wrong time because of the recession. We even have owners who received great offers for their businesses that assume the offer is depressed because of the current economy and reject the bid.  In some of these cases, the offer and deal structure is far superior to the one they received before the downturn. See our earlier blog entry for more information 2009 is a Horrible Time to Sell My Business, Isn't it? 

To these two groups of owners I would like to relate a true story, names changed to protect the (you fill in the blank), about a business owner we have been talking to over the last four years.  We first spoke to Ben Adams in 2005 after he had expressed interest in learning what his business was worth if he were to exit. Ben had an established family owned multi-tiered lumber business based in the Southeast, Adams Lumber. Adams Lumber was an integrated lumber business.  They owned the timberland, the saw mill and kilns and had set up an enviable regional and international network of distributors. They were on the top of the world in 2005 with the building boom having gross sales in excess of $30,000,000 and great margins based on owning the entire supply chain. They could optimize their business by supplementing their own resources in the most profitable areas. If logs were highly valued, they could cut more timber.  If logs went down in value, they would buy from others and use their processing/distribution for maximum profits while letting their trees get bigger.

We spoke to Ben Adams again in 2006 and growth was flat but profits were up through optimization of the supply chain. Ben had also finally made the move from his small local bank to a regional bank(that had been courting him for years) giving him larger credit lines at cheaper rates resulting in more dollars to the bottom line. Some of the timberland was worth more for residential development and he had it rezoned.  They considered selling the land, but were waiting until values were at there peak. Multiples and valuations were high, so we told him again this was a great time to sell especially if the growth had slowed he basically had maxed out the value of his business.

In 2007 when we spoke to Ben things had slowed in the lumber business as building in areas like Florida had stopped and some national builders were slowing down. We told him he should really think about getting out now based on two good years of financial data.  We told him the slow down would decrease the value of the business somewhat, but he was still way ahead of where he ever expected to be three years ago. Ben thought the slow down would be short lived and the demand for his products would come back in short order …“Hey, builders are always going to need 2 by 4's.”

Well, by 2008 Ben’s business had shrunk to pre-2003 levels and he was nervous about his window of opportunity.  We told him that some turnaround funds were rolling up lumber companies with a plan to take advantage of the economies of scale scenario and ride out the downturn.  At that point, we could still get him a decent price for his business.

Ben cut off all communications with us until March of 2009 when he contacted us out of the blue. We went out to lunch and learned that the $30,000,000 business was now a $3,000,000 dollar business. Adams Lumber had laid-off most of their employees and Ben and his son were directly involved in running the saw mill. Other timberland and saw mill owners were suffering and had to sell their products below their cost. Ben was buying green cut wood from other saw mills, drying it their lumber kilns and selling it to their distributors at some profit. There were problems though; their kilns were designed to run on the saw dust waste from the saw mill which wasn't there.  In fact saw dust was hard to find and expensive to transport. One of the kilns could run on propane, but that really cut into profits. The timberland they thought they could sell for development was now worth little for that purpose and they were considering selling it to a hunting club. Ben went to the regional bank he had changed over to in 2006, told them that business was slow and asked for a reduction in his interest rate to help him get through the downturn. The regional bank responded by asking Ben for full financial documentation to justify the credit line and would not respond when Ben asked if they were going to call in his balance…something he thought the small local bank never would have done. We talked to Ben about finding a buyer of distressed companies with the idea he could salvage more than a forced liquidation sale or bankruptcy.

Here we are in June 2009, Ben doesn't answer his cell phone and his e-mail address now bounces. We sincerely hope Ben was able to work something out with bank and we will hear from him again. Hopefully sharing this story will help some other owners who are on the fence realize that you never know what the future holds. It is 2009, we are in a recession, capital gains tax is at 15%, the stock market is up today, Europe is in worse shape than the US, China is buying oil and iron oar and “builders are always going to need 2 by 4's.”  I can tell owners what their business is worth now and bring them willing buyers, but is up to them to know when to hold them, know when to roll them, know when to walk away, or know when to run. If they are ready to walk away we can help.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Let's Play "Am I Diversified?" Private Business Owners You Lose

Mad Money with Jim Cramer is one of CNBC's biggest hits. Every Thursday viewers call in to play "Am I Divesified?" they give Jim their 5 top stock holdings and he tells them based on business segment and specculative verses big cap, whether thier portfolio is diversified or not. Many Private Business owners may not realize they would loose this game miserably. We have found most private business owners have over 80% of their net worth tied up in their business and its assets. This means at least 4 of their five largest positions are tied up in one stock, ...<< MORE >>

Zen and the Art of Creating Competition in Merger and Acquisition Deals

Top Merger and Acquisition Intermediaries perform four very valuable functions when representing an owner selling his or her .company. First, they develop a defensible valuation based on EBITDA, Add-backs and Multiples. Second, the intermediary confidentially markets the business to a wide spectrum of potential acquirers. Third, they create competition to insure the owner receives the best possible price for their business. And finally, the intermediary negotiates a deal structure so the owner can keep the largest percentage of the hard fought proceeds after taxes. 

In my experience, Creating Competition is the most important step of the process and is often over looked by deal makers. This step adds the most value to the owner-intermediary relationship. A company owner simply can't create competition as credibly as a third party intermediary.  

Creating competition, or at least the impression a company is a sought after should be a component of every deal, and the intermediary is in the best position to do it honestly and ethically. Let me share personal anecdote to drive this point home. In my college days I was somewhat less than adept at meeting women to date. By the time I got over insecurity and was ready to ask a girl out, the opportunity had passed. I had developed a very close friendship with a very attractive woman (who I call Dawn), unfortunately my romantic interest in Dawn was not reciprocated. Dawn and I became extremely close friends, we took classes together, we ate lunch together, we played racket ball, we went to parties together and danced (you get the picture.) I noticed over time that people were treating me differently because of the assumptions they would make based on the appearance of my relationship with Dawn. Men were envious of their perception of my relationship with Dawn, and more importantly women, who had not really paid attention to me, suddenly began to want to meet me (hopefully this story begins to make sense.)  At no point did I think it was appropriate to discuss the precise nature of my relationship with Dawn with any third person. 

A small percentage of companies have the magic EBIT number, the right annual revenues, are in a sought after industry, and have two years of solid growth that make them attractive to any acquirer and create competition automatically. The vast majority of companies don't fit exactly into a potential acquirer’s ideal matrices and have a few warts on them; so acquirers are unlikely to fight over the opportunity bid up the price. The vast majority of companies need to be seen with "Dawn" to attract the right acquirer and bring the best offer; and it is up to a good intermediary to develop this perception for the company. This can be done entirely honestly and ethically over time. Confidentiality and ethics precludes an intermediary from giving any details concerning a potential acquirer to another potential acquirer, but an intermediary is not bound to deny the existence of the other acquirer. An owner simply would be viewed as disingenuous doing the exact same thing. The majority of deals I have been involved with would not have gotten the best price without competition. Many times when the acquirer was on the fence, they would not have issued a timely Letter of Intent unless they sensed competition for the deal.  

In modern M&A market place there are always at least two or three potential acquirers for every deal, a good intermediary knows how to find them and develop an atmosphere of competition to insure their client gets the best possible price and deal structure for their company.

 

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

2009 Is A Horrible Time To Sell My Business-You Could Be Horribly Wrong

If you own a business you presumably have a working knowledge of  business basics such as: supply and demand, supply chain dynamics, availability of capital, and valuation. As a Mergers and Acquisition Intermediary, I like to think I know how they apply to my business and how they can have a huge impact recapitalizing or exiting your business. I talk to business owners and groups who seek to buy established businesses every day. In this blog I will focus on the lower Middle Market businesses with annual revenues of $5-$75 million, but these concepts apply to larger and smaller businesses as well.

Supply and Demand and Supply Chain Dynamics: There is a huge industry called Private Equity that has thrived for last 10 years and they are still around, even in  a recession. Private Equity buys businesses, runs them, merges them, grows them, sells them and sometimes takes them public. There is a food chain in Private Equity: from groups that acquire businesses with as little as $2-3 million dollars in revenues-to The Carlyle Group, Blackstone, KKR, Goldman Sachs, and others who acquire multi billion dollar companies; and the thousands of groups that fall in between these ends of the spectrum. These groups all have one thing in common they need to acquire companies to keep their businesses running. Many business owners are currently afraid to sell in a recession creating a huge lack of supply of companies, short supply-same demand-raise prices. Bigger fish are paying more for bigger companies and it trickles all the way down to the lower middle market.

Availability of Capital: You say this is all nonsense Private Equity can't get capital from frozen Banks, you're right they can't so they are either buying bank assets (IndyMac acquired by a group lead by Dune Capital), or becoming banks like Goldman Sachs. The Private Equity business generates profits for private individuals and groups who invest capital with them. They have used banks for leverage in huge deals in the past but there are now more then enough alternative sources to replace bank capital at historical interest rates. No one wants to put investment capital into banks or very low fixed interest securities for the longer term. Most Private Equity have far more cash then can deploy in the current market, leading to a spike in demand for business to acquire.  Every day I have private equity groups calling me saying "We have to deploy capital", "30 day closings", "No bank financing", "No owner financing" there is simply too much cash and not enough product for Private Equity to conduct business.

Valuation: Business are valued on historical performance typically in a multiple of EBIT or EBITDA; and this multiple is set by what the market will pay. What the market will pay is based largely on the availability of companies. So the two questions you have to ask yourself are: Do I want my company valued base primarily on 2007-2008 EBIT or 2009-2010 EBIT? and, Do I want to sell my company when there is a huge shortage in the market or do I want to wait until 2011 and beyond when baby boomers start turning 65 and flood the market?

As you can read in previous blog entries, companies down 10-15% are widely considered to be thriving in the current economy and those that are flat are big growth stories. We consistently have demand for distressed companies and those in need of capital infusions, no matter what shape your company is in, now is the time to look to Private Equity. Finding private equity for middle market companies is what we do, click on the Transact Partners International link (
www.transactint.com ) and lets talk.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Flat Performance is the New Growth

 

I have spoken with several potential acquirers recently about a business we are marketing that projects 2009 to a flat year. This business is an industrial manufacturer and is being evaluated by strategic acquirers. When I tell potential acquirers that business is flat and we believe it is going to stay that way in 2009, they are all somewhat amazed by this performance. One potential acquirer told me "Flat is the new Growth." These acquirers all hold a variety of other industrial companies that are down 15-25% off 2007-2008 levels, which seems to be the norm for most industrial companies. A business with flat sales or down less than 10% is viewed as a growth company in this economy. These companies are holding their 2007-2008 EBITDA and multiples, as there is a huge shortage of deals like this on the market. So if your business is flat or only down 10%; you are in a small minority and it is a great time to bring your company to market.

 

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Is now the right time to sell my company?

   We have been receiving unprecedented calls form Private Equity Groups (PEGs) seeking deals in March and early April 2009. There appears to be a real shortage of good companies on the market and plenty of cash on the sidelines looking to be deployed.  Many of the  PEGs we speak to have recently raised capital form private individuals and are looking to make acquisitions with out any bank or mezzanine financing. We even have seen private companies raise capital through private placements avoiding the necessity of involving a bank to an acquisition. 
    You may ask, Is this activity a result of bargains and distress sales? Our answer is a resounding NO, deals are holding 2007-2008 multiples. I recently received an e-mail from a PEG principal complaining there are no bargains sales due to the economy. Remember when you sell or extract capital from your private company you are doing it based on historical performance not the future, and current conditions make it a great time to maximize on your companies success in 2007-2008.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

Dealing with PEGs


PEG deals are far more complex than those involving individual or strategic acquirers. Given the intricacies of the deal, and to combat the experience of the PEG, business owners need to have their own advocates (professional M&A Advisers) their own to ensure that the PEG does not take advantage of the business owner. Some of the things that business owners need to prepare for when dealing with a PEG:




-Clean up the books and have recasted financial statements developed. Clean books open the field of potential buyers, increase multiples, and maximize the value of a ...<< MORE >>

What to do with an unsolicited offer for your business??

What will you do as a business owner if you find yourself in the position of entertaining an unsolicited offer from a Private Equity Group or Corporate Acquirer? This phenomenon is happening more frequently than you may think. Due to the instability of the stock market, more and more groups and companies are searching for businesses to acquire. If you are considering selling your business, it’s a great time to execute your exit plan…even in this economy!! << MORE >>